Added modifications after meeting with Mélina

This commit is contained in:
Louis Lacoste 2023-11-29 19:56:25 +01:00
parent fff517b526
commit e62b560e0a

View file

@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ N <- 100 # Number of different simulations
# stringsAsFactors = default.stringsAsFactors()
# )
# Arbre
tree <- rphylo(n, 0.1, 0)
## Groupes
@ -34,85 +35,99 @@ get_group <- function(tip) {
return(1)
}
phylo_group <- as.factor(sapply(1:n, get_group))
# Computing groups
phylo_groups <- as.factor(sapply(1:n, get_group))
non_phylo_groups <- as.factor(sample(c(1, 2, 3), n, replace = TRUE))
overall_p <- function(my_model) {
f <- summary(my_model)$fstatistic
p <- pf(f[1], f[2], f[3], lower.tail = F)
attributes(p) <- NULL
return(p)
}
compute_y <- function(mu_vect, groups) {
rowSums(sapply(seq_along(mu_vect), function(i) mu_vect[i] * (groups == i)))
}
# TODO : Regarder correspondance OU avec MB(+erreur de mesures)
# TODO : Refaire avec un Ornhstein-Uhlenbeck
# Code for one simulation
simulate_positive_negative <- function(sim_id, n = 100, stoch_process = "BM", tree = tree, phylo_group = phylo_group) {
simulate_ <- function(sim_id,
groups,
n = 100,
stoch_process = "BM",
tree = tree,
mu_vect = c(2, -5, 2),
risk_threshold = 0.05,
sub_branches = 0,
sigma2_measure_err = 1,
sigma2_intra_species = 1) {
# What hypo are we testing ?
is_H0 <- length(unique(mu_vect)) == 1
# Are we adding sub-branches ?
if (sub_branches != 0) {
## TODO: rajouter 3 petites branches au bout de l'arbre pour illustrer la variabilité intra-espece.
## regarder si ça dégrade la performance
# TODO: Add sub-branching
stop("The sub branches needs to be implemented.")
}
sigma2err <- 1
# Continuous phylo trait
trait <- rTrait(1, tree, stoch_process)
# Adding noise to the trait
trait <- trait + rnorm(n, mean = 0, sqrt(sigma2err))
# Simulation positive
# TODO : Refaire avec un Ornhstein-Uhlenbeck
## TODO refaire avec ces modalités et évaluer les erreurs de type 1 et erreurs de type 2
## faire scénario H_0: mu egaux -> ANOVA se plante car dep entre les indivs
## faire scenario H_1: mu differents -> supp ANOVA phylo se plante car pas de dep entre indiv
## TODO: rajouter 3 petites branches au bout de l'arbre pour illustrer la variabilité intra-espece.
## regarder si ça dégrade la performance
# TODO : Regarder correspondance OU avec MB(+erreur de mesures)
# Adding measure noise to the trait
trait <- trait + rnorm(n, mean = 0, sqrt(sigma2_measure_err))
# Simulation
## Réponse
mu1 <- 2
mu2 <- -5
mu3 <- 2
y <- mu1 * (phylo_group == 1) + mu2 * (phylo_group == 2) + mu3 * (phylo_group == 3)
y <- compute_y(mu_vect = mu_vect, groups)
y <- y + trait
# par(mar = c(5, 0, 0, 0) + 0.1)
# plot(tree, show.tip.label = FALSE, x.lim = 50)
# tiplabels(bg = group, pch = 21)
# phydataplot(y, tree, scaling = 0.1, offset = 4)
## ANOVAs
fit_ANOVA <- lm(y ~ groups)
fitphy_ANOVA <- phylolm(y ~ groups, phy = tree, model = stoch_process)
pos_fit_ANOVA <- lm(y ~ phylo_group)
## TODO refaire avec ces modalités et évaluer les erreurs de type 1 et erreurs de type 2
## faire scénario H_0: mu egaux -> ANOVA se plante car dep entre les indivs
## faire scenario H_1: mu differents -> supp ANOVA phylo se plante car pas de dep entre indiv
pos_fitphy_ANOVA <- phylolm(y ~ phylo_group, phy = tree)
methods <- as.factor(c("ANOVA", "ANOVA-Phylo"))
if(is_H0){
correct_hypothesis <- rep("H0", 2)
has_selected_correctly <- c(
overall_p(summary(fit_ANOVA)) > risk_threshold,
overall_p(summary(fitphy_ANOVA)) > risk_threshold
)
} else {
correct_hypothesis <- rep("H1", 2)
# Simulation négative
# If the p_value is below the risk_threshold the H0 is rejected
has_selected_correctly <- c(
overall_p(summary(fit_ANOVA)) <= risk_threshold,
overall_p(summary(fitphy_ANOVA)) <= risk_threshold
)
}
groups_non_phylo <- as.factor(sample(c(1, 2, 3), n, replace = TRUE))
y_non_phy <- mu1 * (groups_non_phylo == 1) + mu2 * (groups_non_phylo == 2) + mu3 * (groups_non_phylo == 3)
y_non_phy <- y_non_phy + trait
results <- data.frame(
sim_id = rep(sim_id, 2),
methods = methods,
correct_hypothesis = correct_hypothesis,
has_selected_correctly = has_selected_correctly
)
# par(mar = c(5, 0, 0, 0) + 0.1)
# plot(tree, show.tip.label = FALSE, x.lim = 50)
# tiplabels(bg = groups_non_phylo, pch = 21)
# phydataplot(y_non_phy, tree, scaling = 0.1, offset = 4)
neg_fit_ANOVA <- lm(y_non_phy ~ groups_non_phylo)
neg_fitphy_ANOVA <- phylolm(y_non_phy ~ groups_non_phylo, phy = tree)
# Summary
## Positive
pos_fit_summary <- summary(pos_fit_ANOVA)
pos_fitphy_summary <- summary(pos_fitphy_ANOVA)
## Negative
neg_fit_summary <- summary(neg_fit_ANOVA)
neg_fitphy_summary <- summary(neg_fitphy_ANOVA)
return(data.frame(
sim_id = sim_id,
positive_classic_r_squared = pos_fit_summary$r.squared,
positive_phylo_r_squared = pos_fitphy_summary$r.squared,
positive_classic_adjusted_r_squared = pos_fit_summary$adj.r.squared,
positive_phylo_adjusted_r_squared = pos_fitphy_summary$adj.r.squared,
negative_classic_r_squared = neg_fit_summary$r.squared,
negative_phylo_r_squared = neg_fitphy_summary$r.squared,
negative_classic_adjusted_r_squared = neg_fit_summary$adj.r.squared,
negative_phylo_adjusted_r_squared = neg_fitphy_summary$adj.r.squared,
row.names = NULL, check.rows = FALSE, check.names = TRUE,
stringsAsFactors = default.stringsAsFactors()
))
return(results)
}
simulation_results <- do.call(rbind, lapply(seq(N), function(sim_id) {
simulate_positive_negative(sim_id)
}))
# TODO : Regarder la notice de lmertest pour l'implémentation de Satterthwaite
# TODO : En utilisant l'arbre étoile, on obtient un modele mixte classique donc on peut appliquer lmerTest