\section[Capacity to distinguish models]{Capacity to distinguish $\pi\rho$-colBiSBM~from\newline $iid$-colBiSBM and other models}\label{sec:capacity-to-distinguish-pirhotext-colbisbm-from-iidtext-colbisbm-and-other-variants} The idea of this model selection simulations is to assess how the model select the correct colBiSBM model among the possible ones: \textit{$iid, \pi, \rho, \pi\rho$}. This difference being based on the row and col block proportions.\\ \paragraph{Simulation settings} For this task we choose the same simulation settings as \cite{chabert-liddellLearningCommonStructures2024a}.\\ Namely, $n_{1}^{m} = 90, n_{2}^{m} = 90, Q_1 = Q_2 = 3$, $\bm{\alpha}, \bm{\pi}$ and $\bm{\rho}$ are set as follows:\\ \begin{minipage}[l]{0.4\linewidth} \begin{align*} \bm{\alpha} =.25 + \begin{pmatrix} 3 \eps[\alpha] & 2 \eps[\alpha] & \eps[\alpha] \\ 2 \eps[\alpha] & 2 \eps[\alpha] & - \eps[\alpha] \\ \eps[\alpha] & - \eps[\alpha] & \eps[\alpha] \end{pmatrix}, \end{align*} \end{minipage} \hfill \begin{minipage}[r]{0.4\linewidth} \begin{align*} \bm{\pi}^1 = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{3}, & \frac{1}{3}, & \frac{1}{3} \end{pmatrix}, & & \bm{\pi}^2 = \sigma\begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{3} - \eps[\pi], & \frac{1}{3}, & \frac{1}{3} + \eps[\pi] \end{pmatrix}, \\ \bm{\rho}^1 = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{3}, & \frac{1}{3}, & \frac{1}{3} \end{pmatrix}, & & \bm{\rho}^2 = \sigma\begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{3} - \eps[\rho], & \frac{1}{3}, & \frac{1}{3} + \eps[\rho] \end{pmatrix}, \end{align*} \end{minipage} with $\eps[\alpha] = 0.16$, $\eps[\pi]$ and $\eps[\rho]$ taking 9 values equally spaced in $\left[ 0, .28\right]$.\newline We simulate 324 different collections for each value of $\eps[\pi]$ and $\eps[\rho]$. $\pi\rho$-colBiSBM, $\pi$-colBiSBM, $\rho$-colBiSBM, $iid$-colBiSBM and $sep\text{-}BiSBM$ are put in competition and the model with the greater BIC-L is selected as the \emph{preferred model}. When $\eps[\pi] = 0$, $\bm{\pi}^1 = \bm{\pi}^2$, $\eps[\rho] = 0$ and $\bm{\rho}^1 = \bm{\rho}^2$, the generated collection is an $iid$-colBiSBM. When $\eps[\pi] > 0$ or $\bm{\pi}^1 \neq \bm{\pi}^2$, the model is a $\pi$-colBiSBM. When $\eps[\rho] > 0$ or $\bm{\rho}^1 \neq \bm{\rho}^2$, the model is a $\rho$-colBiSBM. Finally, when $\eps[\pi] > 0$ or $\bm{\pi}^1 \neq \bm{\pi}^2$ and $\eps[\rho] > 0$ or $\bm{\rho}^1 \neq \bm{\rho}^2$, the model is a $\pi\rho$-colBiSBM. \begin{figure}[!ht] \centering \input{../tikz/simulations/model_selection/eps-pi-rho-preferred.tex} \caption{\label{fig:pref_model_func_eps}Plot of model selection proportions over the different datasets in function of $\eps[\pi]$ and $\eps[\rho]$} \end{figure} \paragraph{Results} On the figure \ref{fig:pref_model_func_eps} and table \ref{tab:model-selection}, one can see that there is a turning point around $\eps[\pi] = 0.2$ (resp. $\eps[\rho] = 0.2$), before which $iid$-colBiSBM and $\rho$-colBiSBM (resp. $\pi$-colBiSBM) are selected very often and after $0.2$ the $\pi$-colBiSBM (resp. $\rho$-colBiSBM) and $\pi\rho$-colBiSBM gets more and more selected. Moreover, the number of blocks are correctly detected in most of the case. These two results highlight our capacity to recover the simulated structure. As $\eps[\pi]$ and $\eps[\rho]$ need to be above $0.2$ to see $\pi\rho$ model being preferred this may indicate the need of a strong difference between blocks to select this model.