\section[Capacity to distinguish models]{Capacity to distinguish $\pi\rho\text{-}colBiSBM$~from\newline $iid\text{-}colBiSBM$ and other models}\label{sec:capacity-to-distinguish-pirhotext-colbisbm-from-iidtext-colbisbm-and-other-variants} The idea of this model selection simulations is to assess how the model select the correct \emph{colBiSBM} model among the possible ones: \textit{$iid, \pi, \rho, \pi\rho$}. This difference being based on the row and col block proportions.\\ \paragraph{Simulation settings} For this task we choose the same simulation settings as \cite{chabert-liddellLearningCommonStructures2024a}.\\ Namely, $n_{1}^{m} = 90, n_{2}^{m} = 90, Q_1 = Q_2 = 3$, $\bm{\alpha}, \bm{\pi}$ and $\bm{\rho}$ are set as follows:\\ \begin{minipage}[l]{0.4\linewidth} \begin{align*} \bm{\alpha} =.25 + \begin{pmatrix} 3 \eps[\alpha] & 2 \eps[\alpha] & \eps[\alpha] \\ 2 \eps[\alpha] & 2 \eps[\alpha] & - \eps[\alpha] \\ \eps[\alpha] & - \eps[\alpha] & \eps[\alpha] \end{pmatrix}, \end{align*} \end{minipage} \hfill \begin{minipage}[r]{0.4\linewidth} \begin{align*} \bm{\pi}^1 = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{3}, & \frac{1}{3}, & \frac{1}{3} \end{pmatrix}, & & \bm{\pi}^2 = \sigma\begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{3} - \eps[\pi], & \frac{1}{3}, & \frac{1}{3} + \eps[\pi] \end{pmatrix}, \\ \bm{\rho}^1 = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{3}, & \frac{1}{3}, & \frac{1}{3} \end{pmatrix}, & & \bm{\rho}^2 = \sigma\begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{3} - \eps[\rho], & \frac{1}{3}, & \frac{1}{3} + \eps[\rho] \end{pmatrix}, \end{align*} \end{minipage} with $\eps[\alpha] = 0.16$, $\eps[\pi]$ and $\eps[\rho]$ taking 9 values equally spaced in $\left[ 0, .28\right]$.\newline We simulate 324 different collections for each value of $\eps[\pi]$ and $\eps[\rho]$. $\pi\rho\text{-}colBiSBM$, $\pi\text{-}colBiSBM$, $\rho\text{-}colBiSBM$, $iid\text{-}colBiSBM$ and $sep\text{-}BiSBM$ are put in competition and the model with the greater BIC-L is selected as the \emph{preferred model}. When $\eps[\pi] = 0$, $\bm{\pi}^1 = \bm{\pi}^2$, $\eps[\rho] = 0$ and $\bm{\rho}^1 = \bm{\rho}^2$, the generated collection is an $iid\text{-}colBiSBM$. When $\eps[\pi] > 0$ or $\bm{\pi}^1 \neq \bm{\pi}^2$, the model is a $\pi\text{-}colBiSBM$. When $\eps[\rho] > 0$ or $\bm{\rho}^1 \neq \bm{\rho}^2$, the model is a $\rho\text{-}colBiSBM$. Finally, when $\eps[\pi] > 0$ or $\bm{\pi}^1 \neq \bm{\pi}^2$ and $\eps[\rho] > 0$ or $\bm{\rho}^1 \neq \bm{\rho}^2$, the model is a $\pi\rho\text{-}colBiSBM$. \begin{figure}[!ht] \centering \input{../tikz/simulations/model_selection/eps-pi-rho-preferred.tex} \caption{\label{fig:pref_model_func_eps}Plot of model selection proportions over the different datasets in function of $\eps[\pi]$ and $\eps[\rho]$} \end{figure} \paragraph{Results:} On the figure \ref{fig:pref_model_func_eps} and table \ref{tab:model-selection}, one can see that there is a turning point around $\eps[\pi] = 0.2$ (resp. $\eps[\rho] = 0.2$), before which $iid\text{-}colBiSBM$ and $\rho\text{-}colBiSBM$ (resp. $\pi\text{-}colBiSBM$) are selected very often and after $0.2$ the $\pi\text{-}colBiSBM$ (resp. $\rho\text{-}colBiSBM$) and $\pi\rho\text{-}colBiSBM$ gets more and more selected. Moreover, the number of blocks are correctly detected in most of the case. These two results highlight our capacity to recover the simulated structure. As $\eps[\pi]$ and $\eps[\rho]$ need to be above $0.2$ to see $\pi\rho$ model being preferred this may indicate the need of a strong difference between blocks to select this model.